Judy Michelle Schulte v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Judy Michelle Schulte |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2022cv02368 |
| April 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Alka Sagar |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV22-2368 AS on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 15 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Margaret Branick-Abilla added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Branick-Abilla, Margaret) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Proof of Service #12 , Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #13 by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. - The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended proof of service that cures the deficiencies listed on docket no. 13. - Plaintiff's last name is misspelled. - Counsel shall contact the Help Desk at (213) 894-0242 or ecf-helpdesk@cacd.uscourts.gov for assistance in properly e-filing documents. (hr) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Civil Events -> Service Documents -> Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints -> Service of S/C Returned Executed as to USA. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
| Filing 12 ***STRICKEN PER DOCKET NO. #14 *** PROOF OF SERVICE Executed Judy Michelle Schulte, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Unknown. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Leland, Judith) Modified on 5/12/2022 (hr). |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #10 , Proof of Service #8 by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. - The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file a corrected document that cures the deficiencies listed on docket no. 10. - You may contact the Help Desk at (213) 894-0242 or ecf-helpdesk@cacd.uscourts.gov for assistance in properly e-filing documents. (hr) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect; Incorrect event selected (see document for further details). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Judy Michelle Schulte. (Leland, Judith) |
| Filing 8 ***STRICKEN PER DOCKET NO. #11 *** SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Judy Michelle Schulte, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 5/6/2022, answer due 6/6/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Leland, Judith) Modified on 5/10/2022 (hr). |
Filing 7
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (sh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Judy Michelle Schulte. (Leland, Judith) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Judy Michelle Schulte, identifying Judy Michelle Schulte. (Leland, Judith) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Judy Michelle Schulte. (Leland, Judith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33096516 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Judy Michelle Schulte. (Attorney Judith S Leland added to party Judy Michelle Schulte(pty:pla))(Leland, Judith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
