K.K. v. William S. Hart Union High School District
| K. K. |
| William S. Hart Union High School District |
| 2:2022cv02398 |
| April 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Granting Leave for Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District to File a Sur Reply and Submit Evidence to Plaintiff Kimberly Kruk's Reply In Support of Motion For Preliminary Injuntion to Enforce Stay-P #31 filed by Plaintiff K. K.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Daniel R. Shaw, #2 Proposed Order)(Shaw, Daniel) |
| Filing 31 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Granting Leave for Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District to File a Sur Reply and Submit Evidence to Plaintiff Kimberly Kruk's Reply In Support of Motion For Preliminary Injuntion to Enforce Stay-Put Under 20 U.S.C. Section 1415(J) filed by Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel L. Gonzalez, #2 Proposed Order) (Duque, Jayme) |
| Filing 30 OBJECTION in opposition to re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re To Enforce Stay-Put Under 20 U.S.C. 1415(j) #21 filed by Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gonzalez, Daniel) |
| Filing 29 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. On the court's own motion, the Motion for Preliminary Injunction #21 , currently set for hearing on May 26, 2022, is taken off calendar and placed under submission. No appearances are required on that date. The court may order further briefing or other proceedings, at any time, as appropriate. Order to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 28 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 DEFENDANT WILLIAM S. HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF filed by Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District.(Gonzalez, Daniel) |
| Filing 27 REPLY In Support Of Motion For Preliminary Injunction To Enforce Stay-Put Under 20 U.S.C. 1415(j) filed by Plaintiff K. K.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Arthur Saltzberg, #2 Declaration Dr. Jeffery L. Hayden, #3 Declaration Ivette Kruk, #4 Declaration Daniel R. Shaw, #5 Proposed Order Sustaining Or Overruling Plaintiff's Objections To Evidence)(Shaw, Daniel) |
Filing 26
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/9/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 6/23/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District, identifying 1.Plaintiff K. K. a conserved adult who is an individual with exceptional needs within the meaning of that term under California Education Code 56026; 2.Ivette Kruk Purported conservator and Guardian ad Litem for K.K. Mrs. Kruk at all times relevant herein, was, and continues to be, a resident of Santa Maria, California located within the County of Los Angeles; 3.Daniel R. Shaw attorney for Plaintiff K.K., by and through her purported conservator and Guardian ad Litem Ivette Kruk; 4.Colleen A. Snyder attorney for Plaintiff K.K., by and through her purported conservator and Guardian ad Litem Ivette Kruk; 5.Rosa K. Hirji attorney for Plaintiff K.K., by and through her purported conservator and Guardian ad Litem Ivette Kruk; 6.Defendant William S. Hart Union School District a public entity duly incorporated and operating under the California law as a school district; 7.Daniel L. Gonzalez attorney for Defendant William S. Hart Union School District; 8.Department of Mental Health a governmental agency for Los Angeles County, providing mental health services for Los Angeles County Residents; 9.Regional Center a private, non-profit corporation contracted by the State of California through the Department of Developmental Services to coordinate lifelong services and support for people with developmental disabilities and families.. (Gonzalez, Daniel) |
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re To Enforce Stay-Put Under 20 U.S.C. 1415(j) #21 filed by Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jayme Duque, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Declaration of Joanna White, #8 Exhibit 1, #9 Exhibit 2, #10 Exhibit 3, #11 Exhibit 4, #12 Exhibit 5, #13 Exhibit 6, #14 Exhibit 7, #15 Exhibit 8, #16 Exhibit 9, #17 Exhibit 10, #18 Exhibit 11, #19 Exhibit 12, #20 Declaration of Michael Vierra, #21 Declaration of Courtney Gaeta, #22 Memorandum of Evidentiary Objections, #23 Proposed Order)(Gonzalez, Daniel) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #22 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Compliance with Local Rule 7.1-1 is required no later than May 6, 2022, or the answer may be stricken. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District.(Gonzalez, Daniel) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re To Enforce Stay-Put Under 20 U.S.C. 1415(j) filed by plaintiff K. K.. Motion set for hearing on 5/26/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit One Declaration of Ivette Kruk, #4 Exhibit Two IEP dated January 19, 2022, #5 Exhibit Three OAH Stay Put Order, #6 Exhibit Four IEP Amendment dated March 1, 2022, #7 Exhibit Five Declaration of Diana Maltz, #8 Exhibit Six Declaration of Daniel R. Shaw, #9 Exhibit Seven Declaration of Dr. Paula Solomon, #10 Exhibit 1A Dr. Solomon CV, #11 Exhibit 1B Discharge Summary, #12 Exhibit Eight OAH Decision) (Shaw, Daniel) |
|
Filing 20
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CASE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED #10 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction to Enforce Stay-Put Under 20 U.S.C. 1415(j) is granted. *See Order for dates and deadlines.* (iv)
|
| Filing 19 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff K. K., upon Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District served on 4/13/2022, answer due 5/4/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Erica Galicia, Senior Administrative Assistant - Authorized to Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Shaw, Daniel) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Lisa Seeley in opposition to First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to To Enforce Stay Put Under 20 U.S.C. 1415(j) #10 filed by Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District. (Gonzalez, Daniel) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to To Enforce Stay Put Under 20 U.S.C. 1415(j) #10 filed by Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jayme Duque)(Attorney Daniel L Gonzalez added to party William S. Hart Union High School District(pty:dft))(Gonzalez, Daniel) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: Granting #4 PETITION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Appointing Ivette Kruk as Guardian ad Litem for K.K. (es)
|
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Ivette Kruk in support of First PETITION for Appointment of Ivette Kruk as Guardian ad Litem for K.K. #4 filed by Plaintiff K. K.. (Shaw, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 Proof of Service of Civil Minute Order And Declaration of Daniel R. Shaw filed by Plaintiff K. K. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit One, #2 Exhibit Two)(Shaw, Daniel) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order re: Petition for Guardian Ad Litem [ECF No. 4] by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: The Court ORDERS Ivette Kruk to file a declaration under penalty of perjury that testifying, as appropriate, to (1) the facts contained in the Petition, and (2) confirming that (a) she is qualified to understand and protect the rights of conservator K.K., and (b) that she has no known or foreseeable interests adverse to the interests of K.K. The declaration shall be filed no later than April 20, 2022. re: First PETITION for Appointment of Ivette Kruk as Guardian ad Litem for K.K. #4 . [See Order for details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION #10 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv)
|
| Filing 10 First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to To Enforce Stay Put Under 20 U.S.C. 1415(j) filed by plaintiff K. K.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Colleen Synder In Support Of Ex Parte Application, #2 Exhibit Exhibit One Declaration of Diana Maltz, #3 Exhibit Exhibit Two Declaration of Dr. Paula Solomon, #4 Exhibit Exhibit Two A CV of Dr. Paula Solomon, #5 Exhibit Exhibit Two B Discharge Record from Devereux, #6 Exhibit Exhibit Three Declaration of Ivette Kruk, #7 Exhibit Exhibit Four January 19, 2022 IEP, #8 Exhibit Exhibit Five OAH Order Granting Stay Put Motion, #9 Exhibit Exhibit Six IEP Amendment March 1 2022, #10 Exhibit Exhibit Seven Redacted Communication, #11 Request For Judicial Notice, #12 Exhibit One For Request for Judicial Notice, #13 Proposed Order Proposed Order for TRO) (Shaw, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant William S. Hart Union High School District. (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (sh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff K. K.. (Shaw, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 First PETITION for Appointment of Ivette Kruk as Guardian ad Litem for K.K. filed by plaintiff K. K.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Shaw, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff K. K., identifying K.K., Ivette Kruk, William S. Hart Union High School District. (Shaw, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff K. K.. (Shaw, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33101351 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff K. K.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit One, #2 Exhibit Exhibit Two) (Attorney Daniel R Shaw added to party K. K.(pty:pla))(Shaw, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
