Marcella Marie Corvera v. Allergan, Inc. et al.
Marcella Marie Corvera |
AbbVie Inc., Allergan Inc. and Does 1-20 |
2:2022cv02497 |
April 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint and to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer to First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants' AbbVie Inc., Allergan Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stanley, David) |
Filing 11 ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO JUNE 20,2022 AND TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO JULY 20, 2022 #10 by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. (lc) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint and to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer to First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants AbbVie Inc., Allergan Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Stanley, David) |
Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court GRANTS the Joint Stipulation #8 extending Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint. Defendants' deadline to file a responsive pleading shall be extended by sixteen (16) days from its present May 4, 2022 deadline to May 20, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Allergan Inc. answer now due 5/20/2022; AbbVie Inc. answer now due 5/20/2022, filed by Defendants Allergan Inc.; AbbVie Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Stanley, David) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants AbbVie Inc., Allergan Inc., Does., filed by Plaintiff Marcella Marie Corvera. [ FILED IN STATE COURT ON 03/02/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants AbbVie Inc., Allergan Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 4/13/2022. (Stanley, David) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants AbbVie Inc., Allergan Inc., identifying Defendant AbbVie, Inc. certifies that the following parties have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of this case: Plaintiff MARCELLA MARIE CORVERA Defendant ABBVIE, INC. Defendant ALLERGAN, INC.. (Stanley, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants AbbVie Inc., Allergan Inc.. (Stanley, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV07536 Receipt No: ACACDC-33123522 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Allergan Inc., AbbVie Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Attorney David E Stanley added to party AbbVie Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney David E Stanley added to party Allergan Inc.(pty:dft))(Stanley, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.