Leah Flores v. JD E-Commerce America Limited et al
Leah Flores |
JD E-Commerce America Limited, JD.com American Technologies Corporation, Jingdong E-Commerce (Trade) Hong Kong Corporation Limited, Walmart, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Jingdong E-Commerce Trade Hong Kong Corporation Limited and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2022cv02506 |
April 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Stephen V Wilson |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (rolm) |
Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE #32 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the following is hereby ORDERED: The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. All previously set dates are vacated and off-calendar. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rolm) |
Filing 32 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff Leah Flores. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Novian, Farhad) |
Filing 31 CIVIL TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 30 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The initial status conference previously scheduled for 07/25/2022 at 3:00 p.m. is vacated and off-calendar. Jury trial is set for 11/29/2022 at 9:00 a.m., with a pretrial conference on 11/21/2022 at 3:00 p.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 29 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael E Gerst counsel for Plaintiff Leah Flores. Adding Michael Gerst as counsel of record for Leah Flores for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Leah Flores. (Attorney Michael E Gerst added to party Leah Flores (pty:pla))(Gerst, Michael) |
Filing 28 ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 7/25/2022 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants JD E-Commerce America Limited, JD.com American Technologies Corporation, identifying JD.com International Limited. (Zhang, Ping) |
Filing 26 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES) filed by Defendants JD E-Commerce America Limited, JD.com American Technologies Corporation.(Zhang, Ping) |
Filing 25 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart, Inc., (Zhang, Ping) |
Filing 24 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES) filed by Defendant Walmart, Inc..(Zhang, Ping) |
Filing 23 IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 6/21/2022 re Complaint filed by Defendants #22 - The application is GRANTED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 22 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 6/21/2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants JD E-Commerce America Limited, JD.com American Technologies Corporation, Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration of Ping Zhang in Support of Ex Parte Application) (Zhang, Ping) |
Filing 21 IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 11, 2022 #20 - DENIED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 20 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 11, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants JD E-Commerce America Limited, JD.com American Technologies Corporation, Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Zhang, Ping) |
Filing 19 IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 11, 2022 re Complaint #18 : The stipulation is DENIED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 18 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 11, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants JD E-Commerce America Limited, JD.com American Technologies Corporation, Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zhang, Ping) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to JD.com American Technologies Corporation answer now due 6/13/2022; JD E-Commerce America Limited answer now due 6/13/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants JD.com American Technologies Corporation; JD E-Commerce America Limited.(Attorney Ping Zhang added to party JD E-Commerce America Limited(pty:dft), Attorney Ping Zhang added to party JD.com American Technologies Corporation(pty:dft))(Zhang, Ping) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leah Flores, upon Defendant JD.com American Technologies Corporation served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe, Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Novian, Farhad) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leah Flores, upon Defendant JD E-Commerce America Limited served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe, Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Novian, Farhad) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Walmart, Inc. answer now due 6/10/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Walmart, Inc..(Attorney Mike Margolis added to party Walmart, Inc.(pty:dft))(Margolis, Mike) |
Filing 13 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Walmart, Inc. (car) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Jingdong E-Commerce Trade Hong Kong Corporation Limited. (car) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant JD.com American Technologies Corporation. (car) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant JD E-Commerce America Limited. (car) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leah Flores. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request, #2 Summons Request, #3 Summons Request)(Novian, Farhad) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Leah Flores. (Novian, Farhad) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Leah Flores, identifying JD E-COMMERCE AMERICA LIMITED; JD.COM AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; JINGDONG E-COMMERCE (TRADE) HONG KONG CORPORATION LIMITED; WALMART, INC.. (Novian, Farhad) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Leah Flores. (Novian, Farhad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33125506 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Leah Flores. (Attorney Farhad Novian added to party Leah Flores (pty:pla))(Novian, Farhad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.