Sonya Hunt v. Social Security Administration
| Sonya Hunt, Sonya Ada Hunt and Sonya A Hunt |
| Social Security Administration |
| 2:2022cv02594 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Karen E Scott |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. On May 25, 2022, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint #8 . On page 5 of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff refers to an "attached Notice" that "clearly indicates that the Notice of Dismissal was directed to DPSS...." However there is Notice attached to the Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to file a copy of the Notice no later than June 23, 2022. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jdo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Social Security Administration amending Complaint - (Social Security) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Sonya Hunt(et) |
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: granting #6 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (lom)
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Sonya Hunt. (es) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): Order Dismissing Complaint (Dkt. 1) with Leave to Amend by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. On or before May 25, 2022, Plaintiff shall elect one of the following options: Option 1: File a First Amended Complaint that attempts to remedy the defects identified in the Complaint. Option 2: If Plaintiff disagrees with the analysis in this screening order and/or believes she cannot add any more factual allegations to his Complaint, then she may file a Notice of Intent to Proceed with the Complaint. Option 3: If, upon reading the legal analysis in this Order, Plaintiff concludes that she cannot cure the pleading defects by amendment, then she may voluntarily dismiss her Complaint. re: Complaint - (Social Security) #1 [See Order for further details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (es)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Sonya Hunt. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendant Social Security Administration Case assigned to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E Scott., filed by plaintiff Sonya Hunt. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
