JW Seals et al v. Itex Group, LLC
| JW Seals, Jr., Vergie Seals and Marie L Pace |
| ITEX Group, LLC |
| 2:2022cv02644 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| R Gary Klausner |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge R. Gary Klausner that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 , #3 , #4 , #5 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue for the following reasons: (1) District Court lacks jurisdiction. (2) This recommendation applies to the Requests to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiffs Vergie Seals, Marie Pace, and JW Seals, Jr. and the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. [Dkt. Nos. 2-5.] See attached decision. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/18/2022: #1 Attachment 1 of 1) (es).
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTES (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why the Magistrate Judge Should Not Recommend That Plaintiffs' Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Be Denied for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue: Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Magistrate Judge should not recommend that Plaintiffs' IFP Requests [Dkt. Nos. 2-5] be denied for lack of federal jurisdiction. The deadline for filing a response to this Order to Show Cause is May 10, 2022. [See Order for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: The Standing Order #12 was issued in error in that it is duplicative to the order issued at #11 . The Standing Order at #12 should be disregarded. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 12
(DUPLICATIVE - ISSUED IN ERROR PER DOCKET ENTRY 13 ) - STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre) Modified on 4/22/2022 (jre).
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants JW Seals, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 Jury Trial Requested filed by plaintiffs Marie L Pace, JW Seals, Jr, Vergie Seals.(ghap) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed by plaintiff Vergie Seals. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff JW Seals, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Marie L Pace. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Vergie Seals. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant ITEX Group, LLC.Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs JW Seals, Jr, Marie L Pace, Vergie Seals. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons for ITEX Group, LLC) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
