David Armando Martinez et al v. Robinhood Crypto LLC et al
| David Armando Martinez and Five Star and Socius, Inc. |
| Robinhood Crypto LLC and Robinhood Securities, LLC |
| 2:2022cv02651 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation #18 , the Court hereby extends Defendants Robinhood Crypto LLC and Robinhood Securities LLC's deadline to respond to the Complaint to 6/30/2022. (gk)
|
| Filing 18 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, filed by Defendants Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration ISO Stipulation Extending Time, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Attorney William M Turner added to party Robinhood Crypto LLC(pty:dft), Attorney William M Turner added to party Robinhood Securities, LLC(pty:dft))(Turner, William) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiffs David Armando Martinez and Five Star and Socius, Inc. upon Defendant Robinhood Crypto LLC served on 5/19/2022, answer due 6/9/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sapphire Macfarlane, authorized to accept, statute under which service was made is not specified by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (gk) |
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendants Robinhood Crypto LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 16 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiffs David Armando Martinez, Five Star and Socius, Inc. (gk) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF LODGING Exhibits to Martinez A-V filed by Plaintiff David Armando Martinez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C (Part A-2021), #4 Exhibit C (Part A-2020), #5 Exhibit D (Part A-2020), #6 Exhibit D (Part B-2021), #7 Exhibit E (Part C-2020), #8 Exhibit E (Part C-2021), #9 Exhibit F (Part D-2020), #10 Exhibit F (Part D-2021), #11 Exhibit G (Part E-2020), #12 Exhibit G (Part E-2021), #13 Exhibit H (Part F-2020), #14 Exhibit H (Part F-2021), #15 Exhibit I (Part G-2021), #16 Exhibit J (Part H-2020), #17 Exhibit J (Part H-2021), #18 Exhibit K (Part I-2020), #19 Exhibit K (Part I-2021), #20 Exhibit O (Robinhoodcase_5000), #21 Exhibit O (5000_Inquiry 2022), #22 Exhibit V (Trade Confirm 3-2-21), #23 Exhibit Kevin Oleary, #24 Exhibit Suspense Email)(hr) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #10 , Consent to Proceed before US Magistrate Judge #9 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Please re-file utilizing the Correct form CV 11D and the correct event Notice -> Notice of Lodging. (hr) |
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson: granting #8 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Consent to Proceed before US Magistrate Judge - Non-Final #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Other error(s) with document(s): Wrong event and form used, the correct event is "Notice">"Notice of Lodging" and the correct form CV 11D form has to be attached. Please refer to General Order 18-11.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (rn) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b) (AO-85) filed by Plaintiff David Armando Martinez. (gk) |
| Filing 8 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Plaintiff David Armando Martinez. (Attachment(s): #1 SEALED Financial Declaration) (hr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Denying #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff SHALL RE-SUBMIT A COMPLETE IFP APPLICATION within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Reasons: Inadequate showing of indigency. Plaintiff failed to provide complete information regarding his financial resources. See document for further details. (gk)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff David Armando Martinez. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Armando Martinez et al. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs David Armando Martinez and Five Star and Socius, Inc., against Defendants Robinhood Crypto LLC, and Robinhood Securities, LLC. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 CV71, #2 Summons Request) (jtil) Modified on 4/22/2022 (jtil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
