Daniel Valls v. Bobit Business Media Inc.
Daniel Valls |
Bobit Business Media Inc. |
2:2022cv02728 |
April 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Charles F Eick |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal) (gk) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Daniel Valls. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Bobit Business Media Inc..(Attorney Deborah Anne Hedley added to party Bobit Business Media Inc.(pty:dft))(Hedley, Deborah) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daniel Valls, upon Defendant Bobit Business Media Inc. served on 4/27/2022, answer due 5/18/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Tim, Office Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Bobit Business Media Inc.. (rolm) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (rolm) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (rolm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (rolm) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daniel Valls, identifying Sanders Law Group, Craig B. Sanders, Bobit Business Media Inc.. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Daniel Valls. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Daniel Valls. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daniel Valls. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33182281 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Daniel Valls. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of the Photograph) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Daniel Valls(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Daniel Valls v. Bobit Business Media Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel Valls | |
Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bobit Business Media Inc. | |
Represented By: | Deborah Anne Hedley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.