Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc. v. Janel Group, Inc. et al
Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc. |
Janel Group, Inc., Maersk Line and Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc. |
Maersk A/S |
2:2022cv02887 |
April 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen L Stevenson |
Contract: Marine |
46 U.S.C. § 1701 Shipping/Maritime |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Janel Group, Inc., identifying none. (Kehagiaras, Andrew) |
Filing 24 CROSSCLAIM against crossdefendant Maersk A/S, filed by crossclaimant Janel Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kehagiaras, Andrew) |
Filing 23 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Janel Group, Inc..(Kehagiaras, Andrew) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc., (Moghaddam, B) |
Filing 21 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendants Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc..(Moghaddam, B) |
Filing 20 STATEMENT Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc. (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 19 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc. answer now due 6/27/2022; Maersk Line answer now due 6/27/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendants Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc.; Maersk Line.(Attorney B Alexander Moghaddam added to party Maersk Line(pty:dft))(Moghaddam, B) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Maersk Line answer now due 6/14/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc..(Attorney B Alexander Moghaddam added to party Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(Moghaddam, B) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Janel Group, Inc. answer now due 6/27/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Janel Group, Inc..(Attorney Andrew D Kehagiaras added to party Janel Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kehagiaras, Andrew) |
Filing 16 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc., upon Defendant Maersk Line served on 5/10/2022, answer due 5/31/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sarai Marin in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc., upon Defendant Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc. served on 5/10/2022, answer due 5/31/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sarai Marin in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc., upon Defendant Janel Group, Inc. served on 5/6/2022, answer due 5/27/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nicole Strauss in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Maersk Line. (hr) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Maersk Agency U.S.A., Inc. (hr) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Janel Group, Inc. (hr) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc.. (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc.. (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc.. (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc.. (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc.. (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc., (Goldner, Barry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33216543 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Schedule A) (Attorney Barry L Goldner added to party Vita-Pakt Citrus Products, Inc.(pty:pla))(Goldner, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.