Jian Wang v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas et al
| Jian Wang |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and David M. Radel |
| 2:2022cv02904 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for final disposition re: Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #7 , Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #11 (rn) |
Filing 12
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY THE CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, re Stipulation to Stay Case #10 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant action shall be stayed until December 30, 2022. (hr)
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (Osinoff, Joanne) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION filed by Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Alejandro N. Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft))(Osinoff, Joanne) |
| Filing 9 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (lom) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jian Wang, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022; David M. Radel served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit delivered confirmation, #2 Exhibit summons)(Wang, Justin) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Jian Wang. (Wang, Justin) |
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jian Wang, (Wang, Justin) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jian Wang. (Wang, Justin) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jian Wang. (Wang, Justin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33221766 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Jian Wang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Justin X Wang added to party Jian Wang(pty:pla))(Wang, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
