Garry Matthews et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Garry Matthews, Dominic Ross Hunn and JAMAR HEARN |
| City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners |
| 2:2022cv02944 |
| May 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: In light of Plaintiff's filing of a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #31 ) on September 7, 2022, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Dkt. #29 ) is DENIED as moot. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 34
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STIPULATION FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE ONDEFENDANT THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDEDCOMPLAINT #33 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: 1. Defendant City shall file its Motion to Dismiss on or before October 7, 2022. 2. Plaintiffs' deadline to file an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be October 28, 2022. 3. Defendant Citys deadline to file a Reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss shall be November 14, 2022. 4. The court reserves December 2, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. for the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss. 5. The parties' request to continue the October 14, 2022 Scheduling Conference is DENIED. (lc)
|
| Filing 33 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Amended Complaint/Petition, #31 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chapman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Amended Complaint/Petition, #31 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. First page is Blank with only plaintiff's attorney information... Formal case information erroneously on Page 2. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 31 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Plaintiffs amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by plaintiffs Dominic Ross Hunn, Garry Matthews, JAMAR HEARN(Attorney William Charles Cole Claiborne, III added to party JAMAR HEARN(pty:pla))(Claiborne, William) |
| Filing 30 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint #29 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners, Los Angeles Police Department. (Chapman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners, Los Angeles Police Department. Motion set for hearing on 10/14/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Benjamin Chapman in Support Motion to Dismiss Complaint) (Chapman, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUING THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES #27 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Request for Judicial Notice, which were filed on June 16, 2022 #23 , #24 , shall be WITHDRAWN and are STRICKEN from the record. 2. The City shall file a new Motion to Dismiss on or before August 1, 2022. 3. Plaintiffs shall file their response to the Motion to Dismiss by no later than September 12, 2022. 4. The City shall file its reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' response by no later than September 30, 2022. 5. The court SETS October 14, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. as the hearing date and time for the City's anticipated re-filed Motion to Dismiss. 6. The Scheduling Conference, which was previously set for July 29, 2022, is CONTINUED to October 14, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. (lc) Modified on 7/8/2022 (lc).
|
| Filing 27 STIPULATION to Withdraw Motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint #23 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners, Los Angeles Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chapman, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 7/29/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Dominic Ross Hunn, Garry Matthews, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Blacknell, Jovan) |
| Filing 24 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint #23 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners, Los Angeles Police Department. (Chapman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners, Los Angeles Police Department. Motion set for hearing on 7/29/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ben Chapman ISO Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #2 Exhibit A) (Attorney Benjamin F Chapman added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Benjamin F Chapman added to party Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners(pty:dft), Attorney Benjamin F Chapman added to party Los Angeles Police Department(pty:dft)) (Chapman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: USM-285 Service of S/C - (21 days) Executed #21 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of summons and complaint returned executed 21 days. 1) Pdf document is NOT a USM service of Process form 2) Due to incorrect event- incomplete and or incorrect information on docket text (missing name of defendants, date served 3) The missing information may be result that the Pdf document is Missing the following: a) name of person (Clerk) who accepted personal service for the 3 different entities ; b) written statute cite upon which service was made to correspond to the docket. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 21 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of summons and Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 upon All Defendants, served by Personal Service service, by Federal statute, upon Clerk. (Blacknell, Jovan) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney William Charles Cole Claiborne III to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Garry Matthews, Dominic Ross Hunn and designating Jovan J. Blacknell as local counsel #18 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc)
|
| Filing 19 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Corrected APPLICATION to Amend #16 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken. (lc) |
| Filing 18 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney William Charles Cole Claiborne III to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Garry Matthews, Dominic Ross Hunn (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33283768) filed by PLAINTIFF Garry Matthews, Dominic Ross Hunn. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Blacknell, Jovan) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: Corrected APPLICATION to Amend #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event is Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64) Hearing date set, but no hearing required. Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(c) $500 fee not paid. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected: Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests.. Application.. Appear Pro Hac Vice. Note: Wrong event does not provide relief or changes sought. Local counsel failed to sign application. Certificates of Good Standing have been required since 9/08. See LR 83-2.1.3.3. (lt) |
| Filing 16 (STRICKEN PER 5/12/2022 G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 19).Corrected APPLICATION to Amend filed by PLAINTIFF Garry Matthews, Dominic Ross Hunn. Application set for hearing on 6/30/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Blacknell, Jovan) Modified on 5/12/2022 (lc). |
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners, Los Angeles Police Department. (lc) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by PLAINTIFF Garry Matthews, Dominic Ross Hunn. (Blacknell, Jovan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF Garry Matthews, Dominic Ross Hunn. (Blacknell, Jovan) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The Filer must immediately file a Notice of Interested Parties. See Local Rule 7.1-1. (lc) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney William Claiborne on behalf on Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Garry Matthews. (Blacknell, Jovan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33231507 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Dominic Ross Hunn, Garry Matthews. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Jovan L Blacknell added to party Garry Matthews(pty:pla), Attorney Jovan L Blacknell added to party Dominic Ross Hunn(pty:pla))(Blacknell, Jovan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
