Steve Groves v. Early Warning Services, LLC
| Steve Groves |
| Early Warning Services, LLC |
| 2:2022cv03043 |
| May 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: Please refer to Order for complete details., (iva)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#22-104) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Sykes, Sunshine Suzanne, this case is transferred from Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr to the calendar of Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-03043-SSS-MARx. (et)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Steve Groves, upon Defendant Early Warning Services, LLC served on 6/17/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cogency Global Inc. - Rebekah DAngelo - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Veggian, Lauren) |
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Early Warning Services, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Steve Groves, (Cardoza, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Steve Groves. (Cardoza, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Steve Groves. (Cardoza, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33248888 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Steve Groves. (Attorney Michael Frederick Cardoza added to party Steve Groves(pty:pla))(Cardoza, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Steve Groves v. Early Warning Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steve Groves | |
| Represented By: | Michael Frederick Cardoza |
| Represented By: | Lauren B Veggian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Early Warning Services, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
