Dragan Zaric v. Microsoft Corporation et al
DRAGAN ZARIC |
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2022cv03060 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Charles F Eick |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Having considered the Notice of Settlement #19 , the court hereby ORDERS: 1. All deadlines governing this action are vacated. The Parties' Joint Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference #18 is DENIED as moot. 2. The court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 60 3. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Settlement filed by PLAINTIFF Dragan Zaric. (Barrera, Patricio) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference (Dkt. 10) from July 1, 2022 filed by Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Razani, Mona) |
Filing 17 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Dragan Zaric.. (Calderone, Vincent) |
Filing 16 Amended NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dragan Zaric, (Calderone, Vincent) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #11 , Jury Demand #12 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document forthwith. (lc) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Docket Entry No. 6 is reflecting the incorrect District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rochainitials. Please disregard Document No. 6. To ensure proper routing of documents, all documents filed withthe court must reflect the following case number and judge's initials: 2:22-cv-03060-FLA (Ex). Thecorrected Notice of Assignment (CV-18) is attached. Re: Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 (Attachments: #1 Corrected CV-18) (lh) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #11 , Jury Demand #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. INCORRECT Judge's initials as "FLAR". The Correct case number and judge's initials are to read as : 2:22-cv-03060-FLA-(Ex). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) Modified on 5/19/2022 (lc). |
Filing 12 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Dragan Zaric.. (Calderone, Vincent) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dragan Zaric, (Calderone, Vincent) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 7/1/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Microsoft Corporation. Jury Demanded, filed by Defendant Dragan Zaric. (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Dragan Zaric, upon Defendant Microsoft Corporation served on 4/8/2022, answer due 4/29/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens, CSC Lawyers Registered Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 4/20/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
NON-CONFORMED ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant MICROSOFT CORPORATION, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Declaration #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 served on May 6, 2022. (Razani, Mona) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Razani, Mona) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant MICROSOFT CORPORATION identifying None - N/A as Corporate Parent. (Razani, Mona) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of Mona A. Razani re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Razani, Mona) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV11504 Receipt No: ACACDC-33251983 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A - PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B - SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT C - ANSWER TO UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT D - DECL. OF ERIN ISO DEF. MICROSOFT CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (Attorney Mona Amy Razani added to party MICROSOFT CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Razani, Mona) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.