Alyssa Fetters v. Sulphur Springs Union School District et al
Plaintiff: Alyssa Fetters
Defendant: Sulphur Springs Union School District and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv03077
Filed: May 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2022 Filing 16 MINUTES (In Chambers): by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Motion). (Mot. Dismiss 10, ECF No. #12 .) As Plaintiff concedes the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion on this basis. (ECF No. #12 .) The Court does not reach Defendant's alternative arguments. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lom)
July 18, 2022 Filing 15 REPLY support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #12 filed by Defendant Sulphur Springs Union School District. (Kuns, Joshua)
July 11, 2022 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #12 OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Alyssa Fetters. (Hernandez, Adrian)
June 24, 2022 Filing 13 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #12 filed by Defendant Sulphur Springs Union School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2)(Kuns, Joshua)
June 24, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by defendant Sulphur Springs Union School District. Motion set for hearing on 8/1/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Proposed Order) (Kuns, Joshua)
June 9, 2022 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sulphur Springs Union School District answer now due 6/24/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Sulphur Springs Union School District.(Attorney Joshua A Kuns added to party Sulphur Springs Union School District(pty:dft))(Kuns, Joshua)
May 12, 2022 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Sulphur Springs Union School District. (lc)
May 12, 2022 Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Alyssa Fetters. (Hernandez, Adrian)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
May 9, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alyssa Fetters, (Hernandez, Adrian)
May 9, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh)
May 9, 2022 Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
May 9, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
May 9, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (sh)
May 6, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Alyssa Fetters. (Hernandez, Adrian)
May 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33255522 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Alyssa Fetters. (Attorney Adrian Hernandez added to party Alyssa Fetters(pty:pla))(Hernandez, Adrian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alyssa Fetters v. Sulphur Springs Union School District et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alyssa Fetters
Represented By: Adrian Hernandez
Represented By: Brandon Ruiz
Represented By: Robert Alan Hennig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sulphur Springs Union School District
Represented By: Joshua A Kuns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?