US Bank Trust, NA v. Cassandra Celestine et al
US Bank Trust, NA |
Cassandra Celestine and DOES 1 to 6, inclusive |
2:2022cv03081 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Fernando M Olguin |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles. (rolm) |
Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin remanding case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case number 21IWUD00434 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (rolm) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Cassandra Celestine. (jtil) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Cassandra Celestine from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21IWUD00434 with copy of complaint. Filing fee $402 paid. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.