Crystal Redick v. Charlies Trio Cafe, LP et al
Plaintiff: Crystal Redick
Defendant: CHARLIES TRIO CAF, L.P., Charlies Trio Cafe, LP a California Limited Partnership doing business as Charlies Trio and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Stephen M Benardo
Case Number: 2:2022cv03093
Filed: May 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2022 Filing 19 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Stephen M Benardo has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst)
June 27, 2022 Filing 18 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Stephan M. Bernardo may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. Filed by Plaintiff Crystal Redick(Coelho, Thiago)
June 15, 2022 Filing 17 STATEMENT Plaintiff's Case Statement filed by Plaintiff Crystal Redick re: Order on Application to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-22), #16 . (Coelho, Thiago)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ADA DISABILITY ACCESS LITIGATION: ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR STAY AND EARLY MEDIATION by Judge Percy Anderson. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 8/15/2022; granting #15 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation. (aco)
May 25, 2022 Filing 15 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Charlies Trio Cafe, LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Eugene S Alkana added to party Charlies Trio Cafe, LP(pty:dft)) (Alkana, Eugene)
May 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has reviewed the Response #13 filed by plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause. According to the Complaint, plaintiff is visually impaired and requires screen-reading software to read website content using a computer. Plaintiff brings this action against defendant based on allegations that defendant's website is not configured to be compatible with screen-reading software that renders the website inaccessible. Because this action involves allegations concerning the accessibility of a website, and therefore is not a construction-related accessibility claim, the Court hereby discharges the Order to Show Cause. (lom)
May 23, 2022 Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Crystal Redickto Order to Show Cause,, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Crystal Redick, #2 Declaration of Binyamin I. Manoucheri, #3 Proposed Order)(Manoucheri, Binyamin)
May 18, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Crystal Redick, upon Defendant Charlies Trio Cafe, LP served on 5/13/2022, answer due 6/3/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Tiffany J Person, Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Coelho, Thiago)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. Both the Court and the attorneys bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in the Federal Courts. To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, all counsel are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Central District of California. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS]. (aco)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than May 23,2022. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). [See document for further details]. (aco)
May 9, 2022 Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss)
May 9, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Charlies Trio Cafe, LP. (et)
May 9, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
May 9, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
May 9, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et)
May 6, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Crystal Redick. (Coelho, Thiago)
May 6, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Crystal Redick, identifying CHARLIES TRIO CAFE, L.P. d/b/a CHARLIES TRIO, a California Limited Partnership. (Coelho, Thiago)
May 6, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Crystal Redick. (Coelho, Thiago)
May 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33257694 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Crystal Redick. (Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party Crystal Redick(pty:pla))(Coelho, Thiago)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crystal Redick v. Charlies Trio Cafe, LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Redick
Represented By: Thiago Merlini Coelho
Represented By: Binyamin I Manoucheri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLIES TRIO CAF, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charlies Trio Cafe, LP a California Limited Partnership doing business as Charlies Trio
Represented By: Eugene S Alkana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Stephen M Benardo
Represented By: Stephen Morris Benardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?