Laura Ramirez Palma v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Laura Ramirez Palma |
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Nancy Alby |
2:2022cv03108 |
May 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
Margo A Rocconi |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph William Tursi counsel for Defendants Nancy Alby, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Adding Joseph W. Tursi as counsel of record for United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Nancy Alby, in their official capacities for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Nancy Alby, in their official capacities. (Attorney Joseph William Tursi added to party Nancy Alby(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph William Tursi added to party Ur Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph William Tursi added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph William Tursi added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft))(Tursi, Joseph) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Laura Ramirez Palma, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit certified mail tracking)(Brewer, Megan) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Laura Ramirez Palma, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit certified mail tracking)(Brewer, Megan) |
Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. Both the Court and all counsel bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in this Court. "Counsel," as used in this Order, includes parties appearing pro se. [SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS] (et) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Nancy Alby, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (sh) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (sh) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Laura Ramirez Palma. (Brewer, Megan) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Laura Ramirez Palma. (Brewer, Megan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Laura Ramirez Palma, (Brewer, Megan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-33259766 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Laura Ramirez Palma. (Attorney Megan A Brewer added to party Laura Ramirez Palma(pty:pla))(Brewer, Megan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.