George Jones v. Adriatica International, Inc. et al
George Jones |
Adriatica International, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
2:2022cv03163 |
May 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
Stephen V Wilson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pk) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Adriatica International, Inc. (lh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff George Jones, (Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff George Jones. (Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33269452 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party George Jones(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.