Juan F. Ruelas v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Juan F. Ruelas
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 2:2022cv03251
Filed: May 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#22-153) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court in the creation of the calendar of Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett, and Order of the Chief Judge No. 22-140 filed June 28, 2022, 2:22-cv-03251-DFM, Juan R. Ruelas v. Kilolo Kijakazi was transferred from the calendar of Judge Douglas F. McCormick to the calendar of Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. After further review the case was ineligible for transfer. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the transfer of case 2:22-cv-03251-DFM to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett is hereby vacated, and the case is returned to the calendar of Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-03251-DFM. (ap)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#OCJ 22-140) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the creation of the calendar of Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following cases are hereby transferred from the calendar of Judge R. Gary Klausner to the calendar of Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-03251-SPG(DFM). (ap)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV22-3251 DFM on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Juan F. Ruelas. (Ver Planck, Mark)
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Juan F. Ruelas, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to not legible. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Ver Planck, Mark)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Susan L Smith added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Smith, Susan)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order Re Procedures in Social Security Appeal by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (nbo)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (nbo)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: granting REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #5 . (nbo)
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Juan F. Ruelas. (Ver Planck, Mark)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Juan F. Ruelas, (Ver Planck, Mark)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Juan F. Ruelas. (Ver Planck, Mark)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Juan F. Ruelas. (Ver Planck, Mark)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff Juan F. Ruelas. (Attorney Mark Ver Planck added to party Juan F. Ruelas(pty:pla))(Ver Planck, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juan F. Ruelas v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan F. Ruelas
Represented By: Mark Ver Planck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Susan L Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?