Simple Design Ltd. v. snaptubeofficial3
| SIMPLE DESIGN LTD and Simple Design Ltd. a British Virgin Islands limited company doing business as Leap Fitness Group |
| snaptubeofficial3 |
| 2:2022cv03257 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| John F Walter |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Text Entry Order STRIKING MOTION for Service by Publication #17 for the reason(s) stated in the Clerk's Notice of Deficiencies #18 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion for Service by Publication #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 17 *Stricken* NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Service by Publication (Alternative Service) filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd.. Motion set for hearing on 7/18/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Silver, #2 Exhibit 1 to Silver Decl (6-7-22 email), #3 Exhibit 2 to Silver Decl (6-8-22 email), #4 Exhibit 3 to Silver Decl (6-9-22 email), #5 Exhibit 4 to Silver Decl (6-13-22 email), #6 Exhibit 5 to Silver Decl (6-20-22 email), #7 Exhibit 6 to Silver Decl (Moble App Screenshot), #8 Exhibit 7 to Silver Decl (Search Error Screenshot), #9 Exhibit 8 to Silver Decl (Google Search Results), #10 Exhibit 9 to Silver Decl (12-10-21 email), #11 Proposed Order) (Silver, David) Modified on 7/6/2022 (sr). |
| Filing 16 STATEMENT to the Court re Pre-Filing Conference for Plaintiff's Motion for Alternative Service filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Silver, #2 Exhibit 1 to Silver Decl. (6-7-22 Email from D. Silver to snaptubeofficial3), #3 Exhibit 2 to Silver Decl. (6-8-22 Email from P Ghafouria to snaptubeofficial3), #4 Exhibit 3 to Silver Decl. (6-9-22 Email from P Ghafouria to snaptubeofficial3), #5 Exhibit 4 to Silver Decl. (6-13-22 Email from D Silver to snaptubeofficial3), #6 Exhibit 5 to Silver Decl. (6-20-22 Email from D. Silver to snaptubeofficial3))(Silver, David) |
Filing 15
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION by Judge John F. Walter. denying #14 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration (rolm)
|
| Filing 14 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Order, #11 [Text entry denial Dkt. No. 12] filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Silver, #2 Exhibit 1 to D. Silver Declaration, #3 Proposed Order) (Silver, David) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of David Silver (Lead Trial Counsel) filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd.. (Silver, David) |
|
Filing 12
Text Entry Order by Judge John F. Walter re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Service by Publication ("Application") #10 . The Court DENIES the Application without prejudice to refiling a noticed motion.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. Both the Court and counsel bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in Federal Court. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Service by Publication (Alternative Service) filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Silver, #2 Exhibit 1-4 to Decl. of D. Silver, #3 Proposed Order) (Silver, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments: #2 Civil Cover Sheet, should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. The document(s) should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs.. (sh) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant snaptubeofficial3. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (sh) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by SIMPLE DESIGN LTD. (Silver, David) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SIMPLE DESIGN LTD, identifying Leap Fitness Group. (Silver, David) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff SIMPLE DESIGN LTD. (Silver, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33292355 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff SIMPLE DESIGN LTD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney David Samuel Silver added to party SIMPLE DESIGN LTD(pty:pla))(Silver, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
