Shelley Hadley v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Shelley Hadley |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2022cv03296 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Steve Kim |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Paul H. Sachelari added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Sachelari, Paul) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shelley Hadley, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 4/19/2022, answer due 8/17/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Region IX. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Drake, Roger) |
Filing 9
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (hr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Shelley Hadley. (Drake, Roger) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Shelley Hadley. (Drake, Roger) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shelley Hadley, identifying None. (Drake, Roger) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shelley Hadley. (Drake, Roger) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Shelley Hadley. (Attorney Roger David Drake added to party Shelley Hadley(pty:pla))(Drake, Roger) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shelley Hadley v. Kilolo Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shelley Hadley | |
| Represented By: | Erika Drake |
| Represented By: | Roger David Drake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Paul H. Sachelari |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
