WonderKiln, Inc. v. Snap Inc.
Plaintiff: WonderKiln, Inc.
Defendant: Snap Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv03311
Filed: May 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R Gary Klausner
Referring Judge: Margo A Rocconi
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
May 18, 2022 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Snap Inc. (jtil)
May 17, 2022 Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
May 17, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
May 17, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (jtil)
May 16, 2022 Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 filed by Plaintiff WonderKiln, Inc.. (Lauridsen, Steven)
May 16, 2022 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by WonderKiln, Inc.. (Lauridsen, Steven)
May 16, 2022 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff WonderKiln, Inc. identifying Darkshore LLC as Corporate Parent. (Lauridsen, Steven)
May 16, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff WonderKiln, Inc., identifying Darkshore LLC. (Lauridsen, Steven)
May 16, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff WonderKiln, Inc.. (Lauridsen, Steven)
May 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CCACDC-33307267 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff WonderKiln, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - WonderKiln Website, #2 Exhibit 2 - CameraKit Website, #3 Exhibit 3 - CameraKit on GitHub, #4 Exhibit 4 - CamreaKit on Medium, #5 Exhibit 5 - CamreaKit on YouTube, #6 Exhibit 6 - CamreaKit Related Posts, #7 Exhibit 7 - CAMERAKIT Registration, #8 Exhibit 8 - Snap Q1 2022 Report, #9 Exhibit 9 - Camera Kit Articles, #10 Exhibit 10 - Snap Kit Website, #11 Exhibit 11 - Snap Kit Application Status, #12 Exhibit 12 - CameraKit in Google Play Store, #13 Exhibit 13 - Camera Kit on YouTube, #14 Exhibit 14 - Reddit Post, #15 Exhibit 15 - Confusion on Crunchbase) (Attorney Steven Erick Lauridsen added to party WonderKiln, Inc.(pty:pla))(Lauridsen, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WonderKiln, Inc. v. Snap Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WonderKiln, Inc.
Represented By: Steven Erick Lauridsen
Represented By: Jacqueline Relatores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Snap Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?