Maria Panaligan v. Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC et al
Plaintiff: Maria Panaligan
Defendant: Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC and Does 1-50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv03364
Filed: May 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2022 Filing 27 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Maria Panaligan. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Carpenter, Todd)
December 12, 2022 Filing 26 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Exhibit to Motion #25 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco)
December 10, 2022 Filing 25 EXHIBIT 1 to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #24 Declaration of Adam Liu filed by Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC. (Salinas, Daniel)
December 9, 2022 Filing 24 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC. Motion set for hearing on 1/12/2023 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Of Points and Authorities, #2 Proposed Order) (Salinas, Daniel)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #22 by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint on or before December 9, 2022. See order for details. (lom)
November 8, 2022 Filing 22 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to December 9, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Salinas, Daniel)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before November 9, 2022. RE: Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days) #20 . (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
August 10, 2022 Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to November 9, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Salinas, Daniel)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #18 by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint on or before August 11, 2022; 2. Plaintiff shall have an additional one week extension to respond to Defendants responsive pleading; and 3. The Parties have not waived any rights or defenses with respect to any potential issue in this litigation, including, but not limited to, the assertion of jurisdictional and any other defenses, either by motion or otherwise. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm)
July 28, 2022 Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 11, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Salinas, Daniel)
July 25, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Warren D Postman on behalf of Plaintiff Maria Panaligan (Attorney Warren D Postman added to party Maria Panaligan(pty:pla))(Postman, Warren)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu. APPLICATION of Attorney Jeremy A. Schachter to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC, designating Daniel J. Salinas as local counsel.; granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy A. Schachter. (aco)
July 23, 2022 Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy A. Schachter to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 7/22/2022, Receipt No. 33680758) filed by Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Salinas, Daniel)
July 23, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy A. Schachter to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. BCACDC-33680758) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing date set, but no hearing required. Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Other error(s) with document(s): Local counsel failed to sign the application. See LR 11-1. See Instructions for Applicants (1) note that electronic signatures are not accepted. (G-64). (lt)
July 22, 2022 Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy A. Schachter to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. BCACDC-33680758) filed by Defendants Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC. Application set for hearing on 8/9/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Attorney Michael J Burns added to party Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC(pty:dft)) (Burns, Michael)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER APPROVING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before July 28, 2022; 2. Plaintiff shall have an additional one week extension to respond to Defendant's responsive pleading; and 3. The Parties have not waived any rights or defenses with respect to any potential issue in this litigation, including, but not limited to, the assertion of jurisdictional and any other defenses, either by motion or otherwise. RE Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #11 . (aco)
July 13, 2022 Filing 11 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Salinas, Daniel)
June 13, 2022 Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC answer now due 7/14/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC.(Attorney Daniel Joshua Salinas added to party Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC(pty:dft))(Salinas, Daniel)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
May 18, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC. (ghap)
May 18, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
May 18, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
May 18, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap)
May 18, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Maria Panaligan. (Carpenter, Todd)
May 18, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Maria Panaligan, identifying Plaintiff: Maria Panaligan, Defendant: Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC, and Counsel: Lynch Carpenter, LLP. (Carpenter, Todd)
May 18, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Maria Panaligan. (Carpenter, Todd)
May 18, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33321109 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Maria Panaligan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration of Jurisdiction) (Attorney Todd D Carpenter added to party Maria Panaligan(pty:pla))(Carpenter, Todd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maria Panaligan v. Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Panaligan
Represented By: Todd D Carpenter
Represented By: Scott Gregory Braden
Represented By: Warren D Postman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Retail Ecommerce Ventures LLC
Represented By: Daniel Joshua Salinas
Represented By: Jeremy A. Schachter
Represented By: Michael J. Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?