Gang Dong v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| Gang Dong |
| Ur M. Jaddou, Susan M. Curda and Corina Luna |
| 2:2022cv03366 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON upon filing of the complaint. (droj) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Susan M. Curda, Ur M. Jaddou, Corina Luna. (car) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner GANG DONG. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by petitioner GANG DONG, (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by petitioner GANG DONG. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33321452 - Fee: $402, filed by petitioner GANG DONG. (Attorney Joel E Spence added to party GANG DONG(pty:pet))(Spence, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
