Yue Wang v. Monterey Park Police Department et al
Yue Wang |
Monterey Park Police Department, Peter Palomino, Connor Crabtree and Cang Sou |
2:2022cv03372 |
May 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Douglas F McCormick |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Connor Crabtree (official capacity), Connor Crabtree (individual capacity), Monterey Park Police Department, Peter Palomino (individual capacity), Peter Palomino (official capacity), Cang Sou (individual capacity), Cang Sou (official capacity). (es) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Yue Wang. (jtil) |
Filing 2 PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST to Produce Documents filed by Plaintiff Yue Wang. (jtil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Yue Wang filed against Defendants Connor Crabtree, Monterey Park Police Department, Peter Palomino, Cang Sou. Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Filing fee $402 Paid.) (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.