Richard A DeVries v. Client Services, Inc.
| Richard A DeVries |
| Client Services, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv03515 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Client Services, Inc. answer now due 7/29/2022, filed by Defendant Client Services, Inc..(Attorney Brett Brandon Goodman added to party Client Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Goodman, Brett) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Richard A DeVries, upon Defendant Client Services, Inc. served on 6/8/2022, answer due 6/29/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens - Authorized Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error 60 DAY Summons #9 docketed in the wrong case. Docket item 9 should be disregarded. (car) |
| Filing 9 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 5/24/2022, SEE ITEM 10] 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Client Services, Inc. (car) Modified on 5/24/2022 (car). |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Client Services, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Richard A DeVries. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Richard A DeVries. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Richard A DeVries, (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33349862 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Richard A DeVries. (Attorney Nicholas M Wajda added to party Richard A DeVries(pty:pla))(Wajda, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Richard A DeVries v. Client Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard A DeVries | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas M Wajda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Client Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brett Brandon Goodman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
