Yang Mo Goo v. Michael M. Kim et al
| Yang Mo Goo |
| Michael M. Kim and Jason S. Yip |
| 2:2022cv03525 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Case is DISMISSED Immediately #3 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lc)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Yang Mo Goo. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yang Mo Goo. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Michael M. Kim, Jason S. Yip. Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue., filed by Plaintiff Yang Mo Goo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
