Manuel Delgado v. B. Birkholz
| Manuel Delgado |
| B. Birkholz |
| 2:2022cv03548 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) #1 filed by Defendant B. Birkholz. (Attachments: #1 Declaration JAMES MCILRATH, #2 POS)(Gamble, Gwen) |
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) #1 . Receipt number LA240966. (dl) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Gwen M Gamble counsel for Respondent B. Birkholz. Adding Gwen M. Gamble as counsel of record for Respondent for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent B. Birkholz. (Attachments: #1 POS)(Attorney Gwen M Gamble added to party B. Birkholz(pty:res))(Gamble, Gwen) |
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Respondent must file and serve a notice of appearance, that Respondent B. Birkholz file Answer to the Petition within 45 days of the date of this Order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (et) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/27/2022: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Consent blank form) (et).
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 Letter Re Habeas Corpus Petition) (sh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth.(Filing fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Manuel Delgado. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Manuel Delgado v. B. Birkholz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Manuel Delgado | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: B. Birkholz | |
| Represented By: | Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR |
| Represented By: | Gwen M Gamble |
| Represented By: | Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney SA-CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
