Jerri Beamon v. Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff: Jerri Beamon
Defendant: Walmart Inc. and DOES 1-2 inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv03562
Filed: May 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Referring Judge: Dale S Fischer
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2022 Filing 24 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Motion #23 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. (2) Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Amend and Remand to State Court - Under Category - Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests. (3) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (4) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. (5) Filer used the event Notice (Other); which does not prompt the user to set a hearing before the judge. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
July 14, 2022 Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT #13 POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF; DECLARATION OF NIKTA YAZDI, ESQ. filed by Plaintiff Jerri Beamon. Motion set for hearing on 8/22/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT C, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT D, #5 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, #6 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REMAND FROM FEDERAL COURT TO STATE COURT)(Briskin, Boris)
July 14, 2022 Filing 22 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jerri Beamon, (Briskin, Boris)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 4/25/23. (pk)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/26/2023 at 03:00 PM. Jury Trial set for 7/18/2023 at 08:30 AM. (pk)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: The Court hereby orders that Plaintiffs MOTION to FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT #13 is stricken for the reasons stated in the Notice of Deficiency: Proposed Order was not submitted as separate attachment. No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pk)
July 13, 2022 Filing 18 DECLARATION of Sanay Panchal re Court's Order to Show Cause for Failure to Comply with the Order Setting Scheduling Conference and Schedule of Pretrial Dates filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Peters, Theodore)
July 13, 2022 Filing 17 DECLARATION of BORIS BRISKIN RE: WHY SANCTIONS OF $500 SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE OF PRETRRIAL AND TRIAL DATES filed by Plaintiff Jerri Beamon. (Briskin, Boris)
July 13, 2022 Filing 16 AMENDED JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT filed by Plaintiff Jerri Beamon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Briskin, Boris)
July 7, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Proposed Order was not submitted as separate attachment. (2) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (3) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer. This overburdened court and its staff do not have time to communicate repeatedly with counsel in an effort to have them follow the rules and orders of this Court. Counsel have failed to comply with the Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates in one or more respects. For example, counsel may have (1) failed to file a Joint 26(f) Report at all, (2) failed to provide all of the information required by the Order, (3) failed to attach a Schedule, or (4) failed to complete the Schedule properly. Counsel are ordered to show cause why each side should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to comply with the Order. Counsel whose signature appears on the Joint 26(f) Report must file a declaration stating who was (1) responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, (2) responsible for preparing and reviewing the Report and ensuring its accuracy and compliance with the Order, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The declaration should state the name of that person (only if the person is an attorney) and the position of that person (partner, associate, paralegal, assistant, secretary, etc.). The declaration shall also state why the Report failed to comply with the Order. If no Report was filed, the declaration must state who was (1) responsible for calendaring the date for meeting with counsel and filing the Report, (2) responsible for responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The same information as to name and position must be provided as well as an explanation as to why no Report was filed. In addition, the parties are ordered to review the Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates carefully, and to provide a Report and a Schedule that provides specific dates for all of the relevant items in the Schedule. The dates must comply with the time frames in the Weeks before trial column and the required days of the week: a Monday (not a holiday) for the pretrial conference and last day for hearing motions and a Tuesday (not a holiday) for trial. The declarations, Report, and Schedule are due within five Court days. The filing of compliant declarations, Report, and Schedule will be a sufficient response to this Order to Show Cause. The scheduling conference date is vacated. The parties are urged to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to make every effort to agree on dates. Further failures to comply with the rules and orders of this Court, and the rules and orders of the Central District, will result in sanctions against one or both parties.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pk)
July 6, 2022 Filing 13 [STRICKEN REFER TO DOCKET NUMBER 46] NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT filed by Plaintiff Jerri Beamon. Motion set for hearing on 8/8/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Briskin, Boris) Modified on 7/14/2022 (pk).
July 6, 2022 Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Theodore C Peters counsel for Defendant Walmart Inc.. Adding John Beemer as counsel of record for Walmart Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant John Beemer. (Peters, Theodore)
June 24, 2022 Filing 11 JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT filed by Plaintiff Jerri Beamon. (Briskin, Boris)
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 7/11/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (vv)
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (vv)
June 1, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Walmart Inc..(Peters, Theodore)
May 27, 2022 Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Boris Briskin counsel for Plaintiff Jerri Beamon. Adding Boris Briskin, Esq. as counsel of record for Jerri Beamon for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Attorney Boris Briskin, Esq.. (Attorney Boris Briskin added to party Jerri Beamon(pty:pla))(Briskin, Boris)
May 26, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
May 26, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
May 26, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil)
May 25, 2022 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Jerri Beamon in Los Angeles Superior Court on 4/14/2022, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil)
May 25, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart Inc., (Peters, Theodore)
May 25, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Peters, Theodore)
May 25, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State of California, Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV12649 Receipt No: ACACDC-33359622 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4) (Attorney Theodore C Peters added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft))(Peters, Theodore)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jerri Beamon v. Walmart Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerri Beamon
Represented By: Andrew Lawrence Ellis
Represented By: Boris Briskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Represented By: Theodore C Peters
Represented By: John M. Beemer
Represented By: Sanay Bhupendra Panchal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-2 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?