Simple Design Ltd. v. Dairy-Queen Vision
| Simple Design Ltd. doing business as Leap Fitness Group |
| Dairy-Queen Vision |
| 2:2022cv03585 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): A temporary restraining order ("TRO") flag was indicated, but no TRO document was filed. The attorney was contacted and has indicated TRO flag was set in error. The Clerk has removed the TRO flag. (car) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON upon filing of the complaint. (droj) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Dairy-Queen Vision. (car) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Service by Publication (for Alternative Service) filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Silver, #2 Exhibit 1 to Decl. of D. Silver, #3 Exhibit 2 to Decl. of D. Silver, #4 Exhibit 3 to Decl. of D. Silver, #5 Exhibit 4 to Decl. of D. Silver, #6 Exhibit 5 to Decl. of D. Silver, #7 Proposed Order) (Silver, David) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Simple Design Ltd.. (Silver, David) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd., identifying Leap Fitness Group. (Silver, David) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd.. (Silver, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd.. (Silver, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33362413 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd.. (Attorney David Samuel Silver added to party Simple Design Ltd.(pty:pla))(Silver, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Simple Design Ltd. v. Dairy-Queen Vision | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Simple Design Ltd. doing business as Leap Fitness Group | |
| Represented By: | David Samuel Silver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dairy-Queen Vision | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
