Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc. v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
| Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc., a California corporation and Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc. |
| UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., United Healthcare Insurance Company, Does 1 through 100 and United HealthCare Services, Inc., |
| 2:2022cv03669 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #16 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time by which defendants United Healthcare Services, Inc. and United Healthcare Insurance Company must respond to the initial complaint herein be and hereby is further extended to and including August 10, 2022. (lom)
|
| Filing 16 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 10, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants United HealthCare Services, Inc.,, United Healthcare Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bohner, Robert) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. The court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary. The final pretrial conference and hearing on motions in limine is scheduled for June 30, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. The trial is scheduled to begin on July 11, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. (iv)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to United Healthcare Insurance Company answer now due 7/27/2022; United HealthCare Services, Inc., answer now due 7/27/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants United Healthcare Insurance Company; United HealthCare Services, Inc.,.(Attorney Robert C Bohner added to party United HealthCare Services, Inc.,(pty:dft), Attorney Robert C Bohner added to party United Healthcare Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Bohner, Robert) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc., upon Defendant United HealthCare Services, Inc., served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Williams, Richard) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc., upon Defendant United Healthcare Insurance Company served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Williams, Richard) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant United HealthCare Services, Inc., United Healthcare Insurance Company. (lh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Richard D Williams counsel for Plaintiff Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc., a California corporation. Adding Mina Hakakian as counsel of record for Plaintiff, Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Richard D. Williams. (Williams, Richard) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc., a California corporation, identifying Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, United Healthcare Services, Inc. and United healthcare Insurance Company. (Williams, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc., a California corporation. (Williams, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc., a California corporation. (Williams, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33379238 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc., a California corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F) (Attorney Richard D Williams added to party Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc., a California corporation(pty:pla))(Williams, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
