Barry Rosen v. LeaseWeb USA Inc et al
| Barry Rosen |
| LeaseWeb USA Inc, LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V., LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V. doing business as Leaseweb.com and Does 1-10, Inclusive |
| 2:2022cv03676 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Barry Rosen, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Leaseweb in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Gafni, Adam) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V. answer now due 7/26/2022; LeaseWeb USA Inc answer now due 7/26/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V.; LeaseWeb USA Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Ashley L. Shively added to party LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V.(pty:dft), Attorney Ashley L. Shively added to party LeaseWeb USA Inc(pty:dft))(Shively, Ashley) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Barry Rosen, upon Defendant LeaseWeb USA Inc served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gafni, Adam) |
Filing 11
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V., LeaseWeb USA Inc. (aco) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Barry Rosen. (Gafni, Adam) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The term "et al." cannot be used on the caption of the summons.. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Barry Rosen, (Gafni, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Barry Rosen. (Gafni, Adam) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Barry Rosen. (Gafni, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33380617 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Barry Rosen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A - C to Complaint) (Attorney Adam Gafni added to party Barry Rosen(pty:pla))(Gafni, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
