Tasneem Mohamad Akra v. Richard Michaels et al
| Tasneem Mohamad Akra |
| Richard Michaels and Antony Blinken |
| 2:2022cv03874 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by plaintiff Tasneem Mohamad Akra. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Antony Blinken answer now due 9/14/2022; Richard Michaels answer now due 9/14/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Antony Blinken; Richard Michaels.(Attorney Matthew J Smock added to party Antony Blinken(pty:dft), Attorney Matthew J Smock added to party Richard Michaels(pty:dft))(Smock, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tasneem Mohamad Akra, upon Defendant Richard Michaels served on 6/14/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tasneem Mohamad Akra, upon Defendant Antony Blinken served on 6/14/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (vv)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Antony Blinken, Richard Michaels. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tasneem Mohamad Akra, (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Tasneem Mohamad Akra. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tasneem Mohamad Akra. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33425474 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Tasneem Mohamad Akra. (Attorney Joshua L. Goldstein added to party Tasneem Mohamad Akra(pty:pla))(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
