Matthew Monroy v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Matthew Monroy |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Los Angeles County Probation Department, Los Angeles County Chief Probation Officer Adolfo Gonzalez, DSO Brumfield, DSO Velasquez, DSO Pinky, DSO Wiley, DSO Meredith, DSO Ochoa, DSO Vazquez, Adolfo Gonzalez and DSO Rizvi |
| Phyllis Cheng |
| 2:2022cv03997 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 48
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER AND NOTICE TO PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 9/15/2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing, no later than 9/23/2022, why the action should not be dismissed as to DSO Velasquez for failure to prosecute ("OSC") #25 . On 11/23/2022, the Court extended the OSC deadline to 12/30/2022 (Doc. No. 38). To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response. Accordingly, good cause appearing, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice as to DSO Velasquez only under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to prosecute. Court Reporter: None Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing 47
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Having received Defendant DSO Brumfield's answer #46 , the Court hereby DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause dated December 13, 2022 #45 . IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 46 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant DSO Brumfield.(Attorney Jin S Choi added to party DSO Brumfield(pty:dft))(Choi, Jin) |
|
Filing 45
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 12/20/2022 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant DSO Brumfield for lack of prosecution. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant DSO Brumfield if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing 44
ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee Granting Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney Janet L. Keuper for Defendant Leon Pinky in place of Attorney Jin S. Choi #43 . (gk)
|
| Filing 43 REQUEST of Jin S. Choi to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Defendant DSO Pinky. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Request for Approval of Substitution or Withdrawal of Attorney) (Keuper, Janet) |
|
Filing 42
ORDER IN RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: REQUEST TO WITHDRAW ATTORNEY Jin S. Choi as counsel of record #40 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The document is stricken. (rolm)
|
| Filing 41 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: REQUEST TO WITHDRAW ATTORNEY Jin S. Choi as counsel of record #40 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 40 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 12/01/22 SEE DOCKET NO. 42] REQUEST TO WITHDRAW ATTORNEY Jin S. Choi as counsel of record filed by Defendant DSO Pinky. (Attorney Janet L Keuper added to party DSO Pinky(pty:dft)) (Keuper, Janet) Modified on 12/1/2022 (rolm). |
| Filing 39 NOTICE OF MEDIATION DATE filed. Mediation set for June 20, 2023.(Cheng, Phyllis) |
|
Filing 38
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Having reviewed Plaintiff's response #37 , the Court hereby discharges the Order to Show Case ("OSC") as to Defendant DSO Brumfield. The OSC deadline as to DSO Velasquez is extended from November 22, 2022 to December 30, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 37 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroyto Text Only Scheduling Notice, 28 , Response #27 (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 36 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant DSO Vazquez.(Attorney Tammy Kim added to party DSO Vazquez(pty:dft))(Kim, Tammy) |
| Filing 35 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant DSO Brumfield served on 11/20/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon DSO Robert Brumfield, Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Phyllis Cheng has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
| Filing 33 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Phyllis Cheng, Esq. may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. Filed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy(Sterling, Justin) |
|
Filing 32
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Amended Pleadings due by 12/16/2022. Discovery cut-off 6/13/2023. Exhibit List due by 8/29/2023. Witness List due by 8/29/2023. Motions due by 6/23/2023. Motions in Limine to be filed by 8/25/2023. Status Report due by 8/25/2023. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 8/18/2023. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/19/2023 02:00 PM. Jury Trial set for 10/17/2023 08:30 AM. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates (Jury Trial)) (rolm)
|
| Filing 31 SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Amended Pleadings due by 12/16/2022. Discovery cut-off 6/13/2023. Exhibit List due by 8/29/2023. Witness List due by 8/29/2023. Motions due by 6/23/2023. Motions in Limine to be filed by 8/25/2023. Status Report due by 8/25/2023. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 8/18/2023. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/19/2023 02:00 PM. Jury Trial set for 10/17/2023 08:30 AM. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) |
|
Filing 30
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 8/18/23. Joint status report re settlement due by 8/25/23. (twdb)
|
| Filing 29 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Tammy Kim counsel for Defendants County of Los Angeles, DSO Meredith, DSO Ochoa, DSO Pinky, DSO Wiley, Adolfo Gonzalez, Los Angeles County Probation Department, DSO Rizvi. Adding Tammy Kim as counsel of record for County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Probation Department, Los Angeles County Chief Probation Officer Adolfo Gonzalez, DSO Meredith, DSO Ochoa, DSO Pinky, DSO Rizvi, and DSO Wiley for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Probation Department, Los Angeles County Chief Probation Officer Adolfo Gonzalez, DSO Meredith, DSO Ochoa, DSO Pinky, DSO Rizvi, and DSO Wiley. (Attorney Tammy Kim added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Kim added to party DSO Meredith(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Kim added to party DSO Ochoa(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Kim added to party DSO Pinky(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Kim added to party DSO Wiley(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Kim added to party Adolfo Gonzalez(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Kim added to party Los Angeles County Probation Department(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Kim added to party DSO Rizvi(pty:dft))(Kim, Tammy) |
|
Filing 28
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Having received Plaintiff's proof of service #26 and reviewed Plaintiff's response #27 , the Court hereby discharges the Order to Show Case ("OSC") as to Defendant DSO Vazquez. The OSC deadline as to Defendant DSO Brumfield and DSO Velasquez is extended from September 23, 2022 to November 22, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 27 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroyto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Order to Show Cause,, #25 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant DSO Vazquez served on 9/16/2022, answer due 10/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Civil Litigation Office VIA electronic mail in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
|
Filing 25
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 9/23/2022 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendants DSO Brumfield, DSO Velasquez and DSO Vazquez for lack of prosecution. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendants DSO Brumfield, DSO Velasquez, and DSO Vazquez if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing 24
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court sua sponte VACATES the Scheduling Conference set on September 16, 2022. A Scheduling and Case Management Order to issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 23 JOINT RULE 16(b)/26(f) REPORT filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Probation Department. (Choi, Jin) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, DSO Meredith, DSO Ochoa, DSO Pinky, DSO Wiley, Adolfo Gonzalez, Los Angeles County Probation Department, DSO Rizvi.(Attorney Jin S Choi added to party DSO Meredith(pty:dft), Attorney Jin S Choi added to party DSO Ochoa(pty:dft), Attorney Jin S Choi added to party DSO Pinky(pty:dft), Attorney Jin S Choi added to party DSO Wiley(pty:dft), Attorney Jin S Choi added to party Adolfo Gonzalez(pty:dft), Attorney Jin S Choi added to party DSO Rizvi(pty:dft))(Choi, Jin) |
| Filing 21 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/2/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 9/16/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Probation Department.(Attorney Jin S Choi added to party Los Angeles County Probation Department(pty:dft))(Choi, Jin) |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant DSO Wiley served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Civil Litigation Office VIA electronic mail in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant DSO Rizvi served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Civil Litigation Office VIA electronic mail in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant DSO Pinky served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Civil Litigation Office VIA electronic mail in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant DSO Ochoa served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Civil Litigation Office VIA electronic mail in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant DSO Meredith served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Civil Litigation Office VIA electronic mail in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant Adolfo Gonzalez served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Civil Litigation Office VIA electronic mail in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, (Choi, Jin) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Los Angeles answer now due 8/4/2022, filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Attorney Jin S Choi added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Choi, Jin) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant Los Angeles County Probation Department served on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bruce Cohett - Deputy Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bruce Cohett - Deputy Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Sterling, Justin) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants County of Los Angeles, DSO Brumfield, DSO Meredith, DSO Ochoa, DSO Pinky, DSO Vazquez, DSO Velasquez, DSO Wiley, Adolfo Gonzalez, Los Angeles County Probation Department. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy, (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Matthew Monroy. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Matthew Monroy. (Sterling, Justin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33452772 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Matthew Monroy. (Attorney Justin E Sterling added to party Matthew Monroy(pty:pla))(Sterling, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
