Joseph Patrick Hannan v. County of Los Angeles Fire Department et al
| Joseph Patrick Hannan |
| County of Los Angeles Fire Department and James Barnes |
| 2:2022cv04058 |
| June 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint, #8 as to Defendant James Barnes. (es) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint, #8 as to Defendant County of Los Angeles Fire Department. (es) |
Filing 11
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, See Order for details. (es)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): Order re Service of Process by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: re: Amended Complaint, #8 . The Marshal shall serve Defendants as directed in the Order Directing Service of Process by the United States Marshal, which is issued concurrently with this order. Service upon Captain Barnes shall be in his individual capacity only. (See Order for further details.) (es)
|
| Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiff Joseph Patrick Hannan, (es) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants James Barnes, County of Los Angeles Fire Department amending Complaint - (Referred), #1 ; JURY DEMAND, filed by plaintiff Joseph Patrick Hannan(es) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2022: #1 Amended CV71) (es). |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): Order Dismissing Complaint (Dkt. 1) Without Prejudice and With Leave to Amend by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. On or before July 21, 2022, Plaintiff shall do one of the following: 1. File a First Amended Complaint that attempts to remedy the defects identified in the Complaint. 2. If Plaintiff disagrees with the analysis in this screening order and/or believes he cannot add any more factual allegations to his Complaint, then he may file a notice of intent to proceed with the Complaint. [See Order for further details.] re: Complaint - (Referred), #1 . (Attachments: #1 Attachment.CV-66) (es)
|
|
Filing 6
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. See Order for details. (es)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. Granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (es)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (sh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Joseph Patrick Hannan. (sh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joseph Patrick Hannan, (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants James Barnes, County of Los Angeles Fire Department Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott., filed by Plaintiff Joseph Patrick Hannan. (Attachment(s): #1 Civil Cover Sheet #2 Los Angeles County Fire Department, #3 Los Angeles County Fire Department 2, #4 Captain James Barnes) (sh). Modified on 6/14/2022 (sh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
