Jonathan Jerozal v. Stryker Corporation
| Jonathan Jerozal |
| Stryker Corporation |
| 2:2022cv04094 |
| June 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| George H Wu |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 41 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Gregg I. Shavitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33800184) filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (King, Robert) |
| Filing 40 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 7/14/2022, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633398) filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (King, Robert) |
Filing 39
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu. APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal and Brian Jamison (Other), designating Robert J King as local counsel. granting #38 Non-Resident Attorney Rachel J. Geman (rolm)
|
| Filing 38 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 7/14/2022, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633009) filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (King, Robert) |
| Filing 37 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge George H. Wu. Docket No. 35 is stricken for the reason(s) stated in the Notice #36 filed on July 23, 2022. Pursuant to L.R. 5-4.4.2, email the proposed order in either Word or WordPerfect to Judge Wu's email address at GW_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 7/14/2022, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633009) #35 . (aco) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 7/14/2022, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633009) #35 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): The attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice must complete Section I of this Application, personally sign, in ink, the certification in Section II, and have the designated Local Counsel sign in Section III. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES ARE NOT ACCEPTED. See Instructions for Applicants (1). (lt) |
| Filing 35 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 07/25/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 37] APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 7/14/2022, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633009) filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (King, Robert) Modified on 7/25/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 34 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Stryker Corporation. (aco) |
| Filing 33 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge George H. Wu. Docket Numbers 29 and 30 are is stricken for the reason(s) stated in the Notices [31 and 32] filed on July 14, 2022. Pursuant to L.R. 5-4.4.2, email the proposed order in either Word or WordPerfect to Judge Wu's email address at GW_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. RE: First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633009) #29 , First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633398) #30 . (aco) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633398) #30 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed for either applicant or local counsel. See Instructions for Applicants (1). Failed to list FL admission. (lt) |
| Filing 31 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633009) #29 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed for either applicant or local counsel. See Instructions for Applicants (1). (lt) |
| Filing 30 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 07/21/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 33] First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633398) filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Tucker, Zachary) Modified on 7/21/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 29 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 07/21/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 33] First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33633009) filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Tucker, Zachary) Modified on 7/21/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 28 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Zachary Tucker counsel for Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. Adding Robert J. King as counsel of record for Jonathan Jerozal for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Tucker, Zachary) |
| Filing 27 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Zachary Tucker counsel for Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. Adding Zachary Tucker as counsel of record for Jonathan Jerozal for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attorney Zachary Tucker added to party Jonathan Jerozal(pty:pla))(Tucker, Zachary) |
| Filing 26 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. as to Stryker Corporation. (Chan, Lin) |
| Filing 25 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge George H. Wu. Docket Numbers 20, 21, 22 and 23 are stricken for the reason(s) stated in the Notice #24 filed on June 28, 2022. Counsel will re-file Applications for PHV/proposed order forthwith. RE: Notice of Lodging #20 , Notice of Lodging #23 , Errata #21 , Notice of Lodging #22 . (aco) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Lodging #20 , Notice of Lodging #23 , Errata #21 , Notice of Lodging #22 . The following error(s) was/were found: Documents were filed in reference to documents that were previously stricken per Order on 06/27/2022. See Docket No 19. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco) |
| Filing 23 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER 0N 06/30/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 25] NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form,,, #19 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chan, Lin) Modified on 6/30/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 22 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER 0N 06/30/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 25] NOTICE OF LODGING filed (Amended Notice of Lodging) re Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form,,, #19 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chan, Lin) Modified on 6/30/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 21 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER 0N 06/30/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 25] NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. correcting Notice of Lodging #20 (Chan, Lin) Modified on 6/30/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 20 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER 0N 06/30/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 25] NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form,,, #19 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chan, Lin) Modified on 6/30/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge George H. Wu. Docket Numbers 13, 14, 15 and 16 are stricken for the reason(s) stated in the Notices [17 and 18] filed on June 24, 2022. Pursuant to L.R. 5-4.4.2, email the proposed order in either Word or WordPerfect to Judge Wu's email address at GW_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. Forms can be found in Court's website. RE: Amendment (Motion related), #16 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel J. Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33511014) #13 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33511052) #14 , Amendment (Motion related), #15 . (aco) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33511052) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. (sbou) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel J. Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33511014) #13 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33511052) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. (sbou) |
| Filing 16 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 6/27/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 19] Amendment to APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33511052) #14 Amended Application of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chan, Lin) Modified on 6/27/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 15 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 6/27/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 19] Amendment to APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33511052) #14 First Amended Application of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chan, Lin) Modified on 6/27/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 14 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 6/27/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 19] APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paolo C. Meireles to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33511052) filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Chan, Lin) Modified on 6/27/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 13 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 6/27/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 19] APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel J. Geman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33511014) filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Rachel Geman added to party Jonathan Jerozal(pty:pla)) (Geman, Rachel) Modified on 6/27/2022 (aco). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. of Filing Consent to Join Form of Opt-in Plaintiff No. 2 (Brian Jamison) (Chan, Lin) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal, (Chan, Lin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Paolo Meireles on behalf on Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Rachel Geman on behalf on Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Chan, Lin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33471408 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Jerozal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join) (Attorney Lin Yee Chan added to party Jonathan Jerozal(pty:pla))(Chan, Lin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jonathan Jerozal v. Stryker Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathan Jerozal | |
| Represented By: | Lin Yee Chan |
| Represented By: | Robert J King |
| Represented By: | Gregg I. Shavitz |
| Represented By: | Paolo C. Meireles |
| Represented By: | Rachel J. Geman |
| Represented By: | Zachary Tucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stryker Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
