George C. Shen v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
George C. Shen |
Freedom Mortgage Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2022cv04124 |
June 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael R Wilner |
George H Wu |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 15 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mosothoane, Helen) |
![]() |
Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Helen G. Mosothoane counsel for Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation. Adding Helen Mosothoane as counsel of record for Freedom Mortgage Corporation for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Attorney Helen G. Mosothoane added to party Freedom Mortgage Corporation(pty:dft))(Mosothoane, Helen) |
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3 days, filed by Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation.. (Mosothoane, Helen) |
Filing 11 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: Counsel are to appear telephonically for Monday's 08/01/2022 scheduling conference at 8:30 a.m. by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #2 . The following error(s) was found: The following error(s) was found: The pro se litigant's email address was added to CM/ECF in error upon the opening of this Notice of Removal case. The pro se litigant's email will be removed from CM/ECF and will not be used for electronic service without the appropriate registration and consent. See Local Rule 53. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Freedom Mortgage Corporation. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff George C. Shen. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/9/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A PAGE 13) (ghap) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation identifying Freedom Mortgage Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Sharma, Dhruv) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation, identifying Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Sharma, Dhruv) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22PSCV00443 with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 06/15/2022, receipt number ACACDC-33477234), filed by Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Docket) (Attorney Dhruv M Sharma added to party Freedom Mortgage Corporation(pty:dft))(Sharma, Dhruv) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Sharma, Dhruv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.