Rolling Roles, LLC et al v. Red Velvet Entertainment, Inc. et al
Miranda Chen, Rolling Roles LLC and Jie Chen |
RED VELVET ENTERTAINMENT, INC., WY, RED VELVET ENTERTAINMENT, INC., CA, CHRISTINA GILMORE, BLOOD PAGEANT, LLC, ANTHONY SANDS, LEONARDO GILMORE, GENE GILMORE, CHRISTINA FERRA-GILMORE DBA ACTORS EDGE STUDIOS, Leonardo Anthony Gilmore, Robert Burton, Red Velvet Entertainment, Inc., Chris Gilmore, Christine Gilmore, Anthony J Sands, Leo Gilmore, Christina Ferra Gilmore a California business form unknown doing business as Actors Edge Studios, Ferra Gilmore and Jonavich Partners a California business form unknown doing business as Red Velvet Entertainment, Mark Askey, Robert Janovich, Alan Bailey, Gayle Gaston and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
FERRA-GILMORE AND JANOVICH PARTNERS DBA RED VELVET ENTERTAINMENT |
2:2022cv04132 |
June 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Dolly M Gee |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 21-Day Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #13 as to Defendants Red Velvet Entertainment, Inc. a Wyoming Corporation, Christina Gilmore aka Chris Gilmore and Christine Gilmore, Red Velvet Entertainment, Inc. a California corporation, Blood Pageant, LLC, Anthony J. Sands, Leonardo Anthony Gilmore aka Leo Gilmore, Gene Gilmore, Mark Askey, Robert Burton aka Robert Janovich, Alan Bailey, Gayle Gaston, Christina Ferra-Gilmore dba Actors Edge Studios, Ferra-Gilmore and Jonavich Partners dba Red Velvet Entertainment. (gk) |
Filing 18 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #13 filed by Plaintiffs Miranda Chen, Rolling Roles LLC. (Quan, Helen) |
Filing 17 (IN CHAMBERS) AMENDED ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. In light of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), which asserts three federal claims, the Court's Order to Show Cause #9 is DISCHARGED. Defendants shall file their response to Plaintiffs FAC with 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A). IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 16 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. In light of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), which asserts three federal claims, the Courts Order to Show Cause #9 is DISCHARGED. Defendants shall file their response to Plaintiffs FAC no later than July 26, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 19-1 Complaint/Petition includes more than 10 Does or fictitiously named parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiffs Miranda Chen, Rolling Roles LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Order to Show Cause,, #9 (Quan, Helen) |
Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #3 , filed by Plaintiffs Rolling Roles LLC, Miranda Chen(Attorney Helen W Quan added to party Miranda Chen(pty:pla))(Quan, Helen) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiffs Miranda Chen, Rolling Roles LLC. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #3 (Quan, Helen) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiffs Miranda Chen, Rolling Roles LLC. correcting Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 (Quan, Helen) |
Filing 10 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Miranda Chen, Rolling Roles LLC. (Quan, Helen) |
Filing 9 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiffs are ORDERED to show cause why their Complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs shall file a response identifying the basis for this Court's jurisdiction no later than 7/5/2022. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of Plaintiffs' Complaint, without prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Quan, Helen) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 06/16/2022, receipt number ACACDC-33479717), filed by Plaintiffs Rolling Roles LLC, Miranda Chen. (Attorney Helen W Quan added to party Miranda Chen(pty:pla), Attorney Helen W Quan added to party Rolling Roles LLC(pty:pla))(Quan, Helen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Miranda Chen, Rolling Roles LLC. (Quan, Helen) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. (jtil) |
FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-33479717 for $402 filing fee. (Quan, Helen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.