Weatherby Locums, Inc. v. Rio Bravo Oncology, Inc. et al
| Weatherby Locums, Inc. |
| Rio Bravo Oncology, Inc. and DOE |
| 2:2022cv04239 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Rio Bravo Oncology, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Weatherby Locums, Inc.. (Barnhill, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Weatherby Locums, Inc., identifying CHG Healthcare Services, Inc.. (Barnhill, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Weatherby Locums, Inc.. (Barnhill, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33499888 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Weatherby Locums, Inc.. (Attorney Michael C. Barnhill added to party Weatherby Locums, Inc.(pty:pla))(Barnhill, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
