Private Bank of Paul S. Barnes et al v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corp et al
| Private Bank of Paul S. Barnes and Paul S. Barnes |
| Bridgecrest Acceptance Corp and Paul Beinlich, IV |
| 2:2022cv04248 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh) |
| Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Paul Beinlich, IV, Bridgecrest Acceptance Corp. (sh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Paul S. Barnes, (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Paul Beinlich, IV, Bridgecrest Acceptance Corp.Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo.(Filing fee $ 402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Private Bank of Paul S. Barnes, Paul S. Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
