Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Tommy Hilfiger Retail, LLC et al
| Deckers Outdoor Corporation |
| Tommy Hilfiger Retail, LLC, PVH Corp. and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv04273 |
| June 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation, (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Fountain, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33508482 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation. (Attorney Jamie Fountain added to party Deckers Outdoor Corporation(pty:pla))(Fountain, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
