Structsure Projects, Inc. v. BOXX Modular, Inc. et al
| STRUCTSURE PROJECTS, INC. |
| BOXX Modular, Inc. and Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company |
| 2:2022cv04381 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Extending Time to Respond to Complaint #16 until 9/23/2022. (jp)
|
| Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to September 23, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, BOXX Modular, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Morris, Benjamin) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company answer now due 8/25/2022; BOXX Modular, Inc. answer now due 8/25/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company; BOXX Modular, Inc..(Attorney Benjamin James Morris added to party Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Benjamin James Morris added to party BOXX Modular, Inc.(pty:dft))(Morris, Benjamin) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Structsure Projects, Inc., upon Defendant Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company served on 7/5/2022, answer due 7/26/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nicole Stauss as Clerk/Csc/Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bacon, Mary) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Structsure Projects, Inc., upon Defendant BOXX Modular, Inc. served on 7/7/2022, answer due 7/28/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montenegro, Process Intake in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Bacon, Mary) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: The Court hereby orders that APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Thomas S. Hiatt to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Structsure Projects, Inc. #10 is stricken for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order 10-07 and/or the Court's Case Management Order as indicated: Proposed order not attached. Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Case information is incomplete: DJ and MJ initials missing on application. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pk)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Thomas S. Hiatt to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Structsure Projects, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33554927) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application. Please note DJ and MJ Notice of Assignment, dated 6/28/22, Dkt. #5 . (lt) |
| Filing 10 [STRICKEN REFER TO DOCKETT NUMBER 12] APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Thomas S. Hiatt to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Structsure Projects, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33554927) filed by Plaintiff Structsure Projects, Inc.. (Bacon, Mary) Modified on 7/1/2022 (pk). |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (vv)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company and BOXX Modular, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Boxx Modular, Inc.) (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #2 filed by Plaintiff STRUCTSURE PROJECTS, INC.. (Bacon, Mary) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #2 filed by Plaintiff STRUCTSURE PROJECTS, INC.. (Bacon, Mary) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff STRUCTSURE PROJECTS, INC. (Bacon, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CCACDC-33532127 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff STRUCTSURE PROJECTS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Mary Elizabeth Bacon added to party STRUCTSURE PROJECTS, INC.(pty:pla))(Bacon, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
