Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. Top Sealand Internationald Co., Limited
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company |
Top Sealand Internationald Co., Limited |
2:2022cv04468 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Mark C Scarsi |
Gail J Standish |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, upon Defendant Top Sealand Internationald Co., Limited served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon James Devine- President in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Alfonso, Kristian) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, (Alfonso, Kristian) |
Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Coversheet, # 2 Summons not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. The document(s) should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (sh) |
Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Top Sealand Internationald Co., Limited. (sh) |
Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33555642 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff ATLANTIC SPECIAL TY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Coversheet, #2 Summons) (Attorney Kristian E. Alfonso added to party ATLANTIC SPECIAL TY INSURANCE COMPANY(pty:pla))(Alfonso, Kristian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. Top Sealand Internationald Co., Limited | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Kristian E. Alfonso |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Top Sealand Internationald Co., Limited | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.