Omar King v. Kingsley et al
| Omar King |
| L. Kingsley and N. Alcorn |
| 2:2022cv04484 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| John E McDermott |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Omar King. (es) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants N. Alcorn, L. Kingsley amending Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 filed by plaintiff Omar King. (es) |
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES WITH LEAVE TO AMEND WITHIN 30 DAYS WITH REQUIRED DOCUMENTS (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS) #2 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (ghap) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants N. Alcorn, L. Kingsley pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott., filed by plaintiff Omar King. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
