Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC v. Fluor Corporation
Plaintiff: Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC
Defendant: Fluor Corporation
Case Number: 2:2022cv04516
Filed: July 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2022 Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Fluor Corporation answer now due 9/28/2022, filed by plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chan, Alex)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/14/2022. (hc)
August 11, 2022 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC, upon Defendant Fluor Corporation served on 8/8/2022, answer due 8/29/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Chan, Alex)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (hc)
August 10, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-04516 JAK(AFMx). (rn)
August 9, 2022 Filing 12 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Chan, Alex)
July 28, 2022 Filing 11 SECOND AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC. (Chan, Alex)
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE: STATUS REPORT ON SERVICE OF PROCESS IN CIVIL ACTION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a statement (not to exceed 3 pages) plus proof of service of process by or before August 12, 2022. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm)
July 6, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC. Related Case(s): 2:22-cv-4513, 2:22-cv-4514,8:22-cv-1247, 2:22-cv-4516, 2:22-cv-4517, 8:22-cv-1248 (Chan, Alex)
July 5, 2022 Filing 8 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC. (Chan, Alex)
July 5, 2022 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Fluor Corporation. (et)
July 5, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV11-C Statement of Consent) (et)
July 1, 2022 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC. (Chan, Alex)
July 1, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC, identifying Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC and Fluor Corporation. (Chan, Alex)
July 1, 2022 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC. (Chan, Alex)
July 1, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC. (Chan, Alex)
July 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33564321 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Alex H. Chan added to party Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC (pty:pla))(Chan, Alex)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC v. Fluor Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC
Represented By: Alex H. Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fluor Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?