Tyrone Thomas v. T. Allen
| Tyrone Thomas |
| T. Allen |
| 2:2022cv04536 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| George H Wu |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, Related to: Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #6 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new action if he obtains permission from the Ninth Circuit to file a second or successive petition. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 6
ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Judge George H. Wu, re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, this action be summarily dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new action in this Court if he obtains authorization from the Ninth Circuit to do so. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Tyrone Thomas. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA242336. (jo) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause #3 filed by Petitioner Tyrone Thomas (hr) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice by filing a written response by no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order explaining that the Petition is not a second and/or successive petition or showing that the Ninth Circuit has authorized review of this Petition. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 Letter Re Habeas Corpus Petition) (car) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Tyrone Thomas. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tyrone Thomas v. T. Allen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tyrone Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: T. Allen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.