Nico Trinkhaus v. Discotech Inc.
| Nico Trinkhaus |
| Discotech Inc. |
| 2:2022cv04556 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| James V Selna |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 10/31/2022 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 10/24/2022. (lb)
|
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Nico Trinkhaus. upon Discotech Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 7/28/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. Waiver of Service signed by JURA ZIBAS. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-04556 JVS(Ex). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Discotech Inc. (car) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (car) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nico Trinkhaus, identifying Sanders Law Group, Craig B. Sanders, Discotech Inc.. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Nico Trinkhaus. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nico Trinkhaus. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Nico Trinkhaus. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33572140 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Nico Trinkhaus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Nico Trinkhaus(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nico Trinkhaus v. Discotech Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nico Trinkhaus | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Discotech Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
