Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc. v. Fashion 18630, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc. and Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc.
Defendant: Fashion 18630, Inc., Easy Pickins, Inc., Does 1 through 10 and Fashion 18630, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Honeyme
Case Number: 2:2022cv04619
Filed: July 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sherilyn Peace Garnett
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 12, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution (iv)
July 27, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc., upon Defendant Fashion 18630, Inc. served on 7/22/2022, answer due 8/12/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gina T Kim - Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CIVIL CASES by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
July 18, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc., upon Defendant Easy Pickins, Inc. served on 7/18/2022, answer due 8/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent or Authorized Person in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen)
July 7, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Easy Pickins, Inc., Fashion 18630, Inc. (lh)
July 7, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
July 7, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
July 7, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh)
July 6, 2022 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen)
July 6, 2022 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen)
July 6, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc., (Doniger, Stephen)
July 6, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen)
July 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33583294 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc.. (Attorney Stephen M. Doniger added to party Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc.(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc. v. Fashion 18630, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Universal Dyeing & Printing, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen M. Doniger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Universal Dyeing and Printing, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen M. Doniger
Represented By: Benjamin Firestone Tookey
Represented By: Trevor William Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fashion 18630, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Easy Pickins, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fashion 18630, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Honeyme
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?