Anthony Monaco v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
| Anthony Monaco |
| Mercedes-Benz USA LLC and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv04631 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First, Second, and Third Causes of Action and/or Strike Portions Thereof #8 filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court hereby continues the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First, Second, and Third Causes of Action and/or Strike Portions Thereof filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. #8 and the Request for Judicial Notice #9 to 09/15/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. Counsel shall take notice of this new date. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 OPPOSITION In Opposition to re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First, Second, and Third Causes of Action and/or Strike Portions Thereof #8 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Monaco. (Barry, David) |
Filing 10
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. (kd)
|
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First, Second, and Third Causes of Action and/or Strike Portions Thereof #8 filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First, Second, and Third Causes of Action and/or Strike Portions Thereof filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. Motion set for hearing on 9/1/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mehgan Gallagher, #2 Proposed Order) (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Anthony Monaco in Los Angeles Superior Court on 6/1/2022, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC identifying Daimler North America Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, identifying Daimler North America Corporation. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV18008 Receipt No: ACACDC-33586181 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Sales Contract) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Mercedes-Benz USA LLC(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
