Matthew Treinish et al v. iFit Inc. et al
Matthew Treinish |
iFit Inc. dba Nordictrack and iFit Inc. doing business as Nordictrack Inc |
DOES 1-10 inclusive |
2:2022cv04687 |
July 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Steve Kim |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT [L.R. 7-1] by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #13 , the Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant iFit Inc. shall have up to and including 9/9/2022, to file and serve its response to Plaintiff's Complaint. (gk) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to September 9, 2022 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant iFit Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Singh, Jaikaran) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Matthew Treinish. Motion set for hearing on 9/30/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Remand) (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to iFit Inc. answer now due 8/15/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant iFit Inc..(Singh, Jaikaran) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to iFit Inc. answer now due 8/5/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant iFit Inc..(Singh, Jaikaran) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant iFit Inc., re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 served on 07/11/2022. (Singh, Jaikaran) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, iFit Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Matthew Treinish.[FILED IN STATE COURT 06/08/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant iFit Inc. dba Nordictrack, re Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 07/08/2022. (Singh, Jaikaran) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant iFit Inc. dba Nordictrack identifying iFIT Health & Fitness Inc as Corporate Parent. (Singh, Jaikaran) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant iFit Inc. dba Nordictrack. (Singh, Jaikaran) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV18798 Receipt No: ACACDC-33602632 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant iFit Inc. dba Nordictrack. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Documents, #4 Declaration of Nick Kriz) (Attorney Jaikaran Singh added to party iFit Inc. dba Nordictrack(pty:dft))(Singh, Jaikaran) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.